Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Equalization: From "Promise" to ComPromise

Alberta paid off its debt several years ago and hence does not receive equalization because it is a rich "have" province. The longer our provincial debt exists the more we pay out to service the interest on the debt. Conversely the quicker we get it paid off, the better the province and ultimately the country benefits. If Stephen Harper stuck to the "promise", or the idea that he supposedly inferred, that all (100%) non-renewable resource revenue would be exempt from the equalization formula, then that would mean billions more for the province. That scenario would be an excellent opportunity to pay down the province's debt more expediently, and get out of the equalization business, albeit still many years away.

Harper's Letter to Danny Williams - quote on non-renewables in the equalization formula:

We will remove non-renewable natural resource revenue from the equalization formula to encourage the development of economic growth in the non-renewable resource sectors across Canada. The Conservative government will ensure that no province is adversely affected from changes to the equalization formula. (Feb. 4, 2006)

That's what he told Williams in writing, it's pretty general and leaves the percentage of non-renewable removal wide open. It does not actually say 100%, but did he mean 100% by verbally expressing that to Danny Williams?

It would appear that Harper has gone from "promise" to compromise. As long as Harper looks pretty in the polls, then he probaly won't budge much from the much talked about, and seemingly expected, 50% of non-renewables, rather than 100%, excluded from the equalization formula. One argument for keeping 100% of non-renewable revenue is that it is a one time only opportunity for that particular resource, e.g., oil and gas. That type of income for the province is finite.

How will the Liberal or NDP's version of equalization compare to Harper's and to Danny Williams' vision of a fair formula? Even if Stéphane Dion made a "promise" to Premier Williams to totally clear non-renewables from equalization, or say 25% inclusion of non-renewables, offer to Danny Williams, which would sound better, then we will still have to ask, "what is a promise?" What does general wording really mean other than wishful thinking? On the other hand, even if we had more detail in writing up front, e.g., "100% of non-renewables will be removed ..", does that matter anyway?

If the province is ultimately stuck with some compromise on equalization, then how about a counter compromise offer? For example, if 50% is the amount, then what if 25% of that were to be mandatorily put towards our provincial debt. That is, in addition to what the province normally pays or should pay, according to income percentages (or at least an average of the last 10 payments, for example). The rule could be that the province has to make its payment towards the debt each year first, then the federally held in trust 25% portion can then be paid towards the debt also.

The net debt per capita for Newfoundland and Labrador, for 2005-06 was $22,733. The debt for the same year was $11.7 billion.

Friday, March 09, 2007

Equalization Promise Not So Promising

If Sasketchewan Premier Lorne Calvert knew PM Harper was coming today he may have baked a wheat cake. Harper announced $1 billion worth of farm aid for Sasketchewan, but as Calvert said later on CTV news, the announcement was hastily arranged and members of his party did not know what was going to be announced. He was disappointed at the way this news was orchestrated, and said, Typically there is some discussion with farmers, and farm groups. He added that he had little detail of where the dollars were going to flow, and warned MPs were going to be held accountable if Harper's equalization promise was not kept.

At the press conference reporters asked Harper about equalization but he had little to say, except that the answer is coming soon. For weeks it's been bandied about that 50% of non-renewables would be removed from the new equalization formula. Sasketchewan has also made it known last year that there might be a political price to pay for reneging on that promise. In August, 2006, Saskatchewan Conservative caucus chair Brian Fitzpatrick wrote that it will cause no end of political difficulty in the next election.

The Sasketchewan Conservatives campaigned on the promise to exempt non-renewables, and they ended up with 12 out of 14 federal seats. It will be interesting to see if Harper has any other surprises in the budget on equalization, and if Danny and Lorne will really attempt to form an east-west political grid.

NL vs Ontario in Tonights Curling Semi-Final

It's on at 9:00 p.m. NF time, 8:30 Labrador, 7:30 Eastern. The game will be live on TSN. Ontario is currently 10-1, while NL is tied at 8-3 with AB & MB. The final is on Sunday and will be particularly interesting if Gushue's team makes it. This is the third year that there is a cash prize. The winning team gets $40,000. Some, if not all, curlers support advertising sponsor logos on their jerseys. It would seem to make cents for all (pun intended) - great lengthy sponsor or advertiser exposure, and likely to be more sponsor money for curlers. Now that could be a good bilateral agreement.

* Update: Team Newfoundland and Labrador wins 7-6 over team Ontario. They qualify for the final on Sunday.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

300 Jobs - New Marystown Call Centre

The company Help Desk Now is an American company and already has offices in New Brunswick, Grand Falls-Windsor, and Guatemala. They plan to hire 300 people for the Newfoundland operations. From their website, jobs are Customer Service Representatives, Technical Support Specialists, and Inside Sales Representatives. They will also be hiring 30 managers for Newfoundland locations. The starting wage is $8.75 an hour for customer support representatives. While the fish plant is still closed, it is encouraging news for Marystown. (source: VOCM)

Renovating

Sorry, no new post really, just trying to work out a few technical glitches. Seems my statcounter does not want to work with this new template. So testing others.

Fed Money for Toronto Transit: More Tory Seats Down the Road?

Prime Minister Harper made Dalton McGuinty's day on Monday with a $1 Billion cheque for the Toronto GTA transit system, and another half billion for Ontario to help pay for an east-west transmission grid to Manitoba. The grid will allow Ontario to import cleaner electricity from Manitoba, thus help to clean up some of Ontario's worst polluters. This is all good. It must be a nightmare to experience those long clogged commutes into the populous Toronto. It's a big gift from the feds, which probably won't soon be forgotten, at least Harper hopes so. This transaction has a familiar ring - fix up the roads, some time before an election, and get some political payback. The CPC's really need to make some headway in Toronto, no seats in the last election. He'll pick up some seats there next election. That could neutralize the threats of Premier Williams to have the province vote for anyone else if the equalization deal doesn't go his way. But you still can't burn any bridges when you need every seat.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Fees, Please


What kind of a greedy crowd have customers become, wanting banks to get rid of the ATM fees, and be like Britian. Scotiabank posted a first-quarter profit of only $1.02 billion, up from mere $852 million a year ago. Record profits, that sounds familiar, oh yeah, it's been news annually at least for the last 10 years. So no wonder president and CEO Rick Waugh (above) doesn't want to ban the fees. Let's hope that there is a total cashless society soon so that they can make more record profits, and silly people like the NDP's Jack Layton won't be pressuring Finance Minister Jim Flaherty anymore to encourage the Canadian Banking Association to abolish ATM fees.

Another Gas Hike. Are you Fuming?


Twice in a week. Ok we need energy alternatives sooner rather than later. The increase for tomorrow is 7.7 ¢/litre. More competition is needed to give consumers some choice on how to run their vehicles. Right now there is no choice but to pay whatever fossil fuel companies decide we should pay. Those poor altruistic companies, how do they get by?

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Sensible and Healthy Initiative

Go Healthy is a website about healthy living for Newfoundlanders and Labradorians. It offers information on what's the best to eat, the benefits of certain foods like fibre, fruits and vegetables, and links to excellent resources like Dietitians.ca. Encouraging a healthier and more active lifestyle is the goal. The benefits are immediate and long term for individuals and also our health care system. There is a fact quiz there with one question that asks,
The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador makes money on tobacco. true or false      Answer: False
In 2005/06, Government received about $116 million in tobacco taxes (Budget 2006). According to the Canadian Costs of Substance Abuse report of 2002, tobacco use costs this province about $363 million in health care every year. This does not include other costs like enforcement of tobacco control laws, public awareness, loss of worker productivity, and property damage due to fire. Worst of all, tobacco costs this province about 680 lives every year, including many non-smokers affected by second-hand smoke.
Well known province personalities have been and will be pitching the concept and site on tv ads. For a province that has the highest rate of obesity in the country, it's time for this, which should have been launched years ago. Well it's in the right direction anyway. Gotta go, need to pick up some psyllium fibre, and a veggie tray.

More Beautiful Places to Visit in Newfoundland & Labrador

There are so many places all around the province that are interesting to visit just because of their natural beauty alone. In a February, 2007 blog I posted many other places worth seeing, and here are some more. Newfoundland and Labrador is an astounding province with an alluring variation of scenic coastlines, landscapes, bays, hills, waterfalls, and ruggedness. It is a hiker's paradise, and offers pristine areas of nature. It is ours to protect and yours to discover.
Aviron Bay (South Coast) below

These photos are not mine, but I will try to find the web source.
Red Rocks, West Coast

Fraser River Canyon, Labrador
The only problem you might have is deciding what part of the island and Labrador to see first. The province is huge, so the best thing to do is get a map, study the regions, and places you want to visit, and set aside enough time to cover a number of places, or the number of things you want to do. You can certainly see alot in a week or two, but chances are, you'll want to come back.

Links for Tourists

Provincial parks

Iceberg Finder

Hospitality Newfoundland & Labrador

Newfoundland & Labrador Tourism

Provincial Ferry Service

Scenic Touring Routes

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Political Deflection

Politics is indeed like a game, a hockey game - one way to achieve a goal is through deflection. We read about it all the time in Newfoundland and Labrador blogs, "Danny is doing this, when he should be doing this". But who hasn't used a deflection of issues from time to time? I'm not sure there are many, or any. Deflection is used to postpone a ready answer to important topics. That can be prudent from the government's point of view, especially if saying something about a development or negotiations in the works, could jeopardize any behind the scenes dealings. If a politician has definite positive policies or developments to focus on, then deflecting negative exposure is wise too. On the other hand it is frustrating, and can indicate that there is absolutely no solution or movement on key issues facing the government. In the case of the spending scandal and cynicism about politicians and honesty in government, I think it would be wise to meet this issue head on, offer reassurance in the form of rigid safeguards.

Each election, one of the ways to get votes is to offer up hopeful words, "promises", to achieve things when the candidate is in power. People who need good news like to hear good or promising news. But often times neither the politician nor the electorate is being realistic about what can be achieved in the next four or eight years. So this realization is observed by the elected, and deflecting the issue is resorted to.

Deflection may very well be one of the most common political tactics used in this game. Mike Harris used it effectively in his 1999 election. There is a very interesting article written by James Winter and Jeremy Gillies, Communication Studies, University of Windsor. They wrote an excellent article called " News Media Rallied To Corporate Clarion In Ontario Election". In it, they describe how the Conrad Black owned and influenced media, "cooperated in no small degree" to get Mike Harris elected. They reviewed over 500 newspaper articles in the National Post the Globe and Mail and the Toronto Star and found all papers to be bias and severely lacking. For example, with polls close between the Liberals and the Tories, the Toronto Star said, "Mike Harris and his team have the look of winners."

Harris had embarrassing confrontations with protestors and withdrew into "a bubble of carefully orchestrated events." The Globe and Mail went to unusual means to promote Harris' Tories. They hired a "body language expert" to inform the public that Harris had the look of a winner, "the whites of his eyes" mean "clarity of vision". In a televised debate Dalton McGuinty was described as "too excited", and NDP Howard Hampton was mostly dismissed. After he was said to have won the debate, he was dismissed as just a spoiler and robbing votes from the Liberals.

Writers Winter and Gillies said that "what the press left out was just as important as what was reported on." Some of the scandals and controversies were ignored by the press.
Harris' possible role in giving instructions to the OPP in the shooting of Dudley George at Ipperwash, the use of closure to pass the omnibus Bill 26; passing Bill 22, which denies basic human rights to workfare recipients; UN criticism for the increasing legions of homeless and poor; ... Tory Speaker of the Legislature Al McLean's resignation over a sex scandal; Leslie Noble and two other prominent Tories receipt of about $450,000 in fees from Ontario Hydro for consulting work that produced just 12 pages of records; the "Lands For Life" scandal that saw millions of hectares of public land given away cheap to the forestry industry; Tory spending of about $100 million in taxpayers' money in blatant political ads during the run up to the election; the Dionne Quints scandal; Ontario air pollution.

Harris got a deflection and he scored. In our fall election there ought to be realism, less alluding to things like, bringing Newfoundlanders and Labradorian home. I'm not so sure that politicians actually use the word "promise", but people seem to use that word alot. The public needs to be more realistic about what to expect. Somehow people think that swarms of ex-patriates will be returning, in a short time. But if Hebron and Lower Churchill deals were signed in 2008, it will create economic opportunites, but it will probably allow 100's of ex-pats to return for work, maybe over 1000. But there are tens of 1000's of province expats away. There are also people living in the province who will be working on projects like this too. There should be more realism on the part of the electorate and politicians, and then hopefully less deflection of the issues.

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Scandals & Fiascos from Sea to Sea

As the Canadian union was just six years old, news of the first Canadian scandal was about to explode. In the summer of 1873 news broke that Sir John A. Macdonald and his Conservatives received a whopping $350,000 in campaign funds in exchange for a lucrative railway contract, Canadians were outraged.

Canada is a great country in so many ways, yet we are still evolving in areas of social equality, and democracy. However, the evolution of principle, ethics and honesty in politics has been slow, and has not caught on with every elected official. Newfoundland and Labrador has had scandals and fiascos before, but it is like other provinces of Canada who in recent years, and currently, have had politicians surrender to the chance to pocket more coin. Some things don't change much. Here are just some other Canadian examples of wastage and dishonesty in government:

Saskatchewan Tories in Fraud Scandal

Twelve members of Grant Devine's government in Saskatchewan, which was swept from office in 1991, were charged in relation to a scheme that defrauded taxpayers of more than $837,000.

There are some similiarities between this scandal and the still ongoing IEC scandal investigation in NL. The seeds of the controversy were planted in 1987, when Devine's caucus agreed to pool 25 per cent of the communications allowances that MLAs were entitled to receive from the legislature into a central account. The CROWN has alleged that some members of the Devine government signed expense allowance claims that were submitted to the legislature along with invoices from four shell companies set up by John Scraba, then the caucus communications director. Many of the invoices were for services never rendered, or for expenses that were illegitimate. After the invoices were approved by the legislature's finance offices, cheques were issued to the phoney companies. That money was then funnelled back to several caucus members and Scraba in the form of cash and merchandise.

Police were first alerted to the scam in July, 1991, when legislature clerk Gwenn Ronyk reported some suspicious invoices. The investigation received a break in April, 1992, when a Regina bank branch opened a safety deposit box after its registered owner failed to respond to a notification that the bank was moving. Inside the box were 150 $1,000 bills. The owner's name proved to be bogus, but his address was quite revealing: Room 203, Saskatchewan legislature, aka the Tory caucus office. After contacting other banks, police uncovered a second safety deposit box, under the same phoney name, that contained 90 $1,000 bills.

Perhaps the most explosive testimony came on Oct. 24, when another former caucus chairman, Myles Morin, told the court that Devine had approved a plan in 1985 to transfer $455,000 - an amount unrelated to the $837,000 fraud scheme - in surplus caucus funds into an investment account.

Eventually, more than a dozen former Conservative MLAs and party workers were convicted of robbing taxpayers in a bogus-expense scheme. Sadly in a much darker vein, former cabinet minister Jack Wolfe committed suicide in February, 1995, leaving behind a pregnant wife and three young children.

British Columbia's FastCat Fiasco

Also called the Fast Ferry Scandal was the name given to a political scandal in British Columbia during Glen Clark's tenure as Premier (1996-99). Hoping to revive BC's shipbuilding industry to some semblance of its past glory of the 20th century, Glen Clark's NDP government, refusing the advice of the BC Ferries corporation to lease a similiar type of ferry for trials, went ahead and constructed three vessels.

The project was originally set to cost $210 million, but due to various blunders by the government, BC Ferries, design bureaus, and the shipyards, it rose to almost $460 million and final delivery was almost 3 years behind schedule. A large part of the delay was due to the fact that the shipyards commissioned to construct the vessels had very little experience working with aluminum.

There were also significant problems like high fuel consumption, little outside deck space for passengers, and loading the ferries took longer.

In 2003 the ferries went up for sale. They were auctioned of to the Washington Marine Group for $19.4 million. If that wasn't enough salt in the wound, there this was: the same company offered to purchase the fleet for $60 million prior to the auction.

Alberta 2005: Worst land deal deal ever

Inside sweet land deals got some civil servants in trouble and cost the government of Alberta. Ethics commissioner Donald Hamilton cleared Environment Minister Guy Boutilier of influencing an Alberta Social Housing Corporation decision to sell 231 acres of Fort McMurray land for affordable housing to the Timberlea Joint Venture Consortium. The consortium got the land at a price set for 158 acres. Not only was the deal sweet, but beneficiaries include Boutilier’s personal friend Tim Walsh, and other individuals who NDP critic Ray Martin says have contributed $14,000 to Boutilier’s campaigns since he became an MLA. To top things off, the $35,000 per acre price was based on 1990 land values. The government lost at least $2.5 million in potential revenue on the sale.

Ontario's Hydro One Scandal
Here's an excerpt from the above link

Reports say Ontario's publicly owned utility paid out $5.6 million to former advisors to Premiers Mike Harris and Ernie Eves.

The players involved in the Hydro One affair were key insiders during the 8-year Tory reign at Queen's Park: Tom Long (former Harris advisor), Paul Rhodes (Tory campaign communications director), Leslie Noble (co-chair of the Tory election campaign), and Michael Gourley (a reported advisor and confidant of Eves).

What's particularly unseemly about the Hydro One affair is that, many of the individuals involved are the very ones who concocted the "Common Sense Revolution" which hypocritically preached fiscal restraint, cuts to social assistance, and scaling back public services. This resulted in a Tory government that inflicted brutal cuts to the poor, ransacked health care, and created a "crisis" in education.

Ontario December, 2006
Millions wasted on gov't credit cards: Ont. AG
Excerpt from CTV News

A number of Ontario's public sector workers can't account for millions in charges on taxpayer-funded credit cards, the province's auditor general finds.

"I'd have to say that we noticed examples across all broader public sector areas that we looked at," Jim McCarter said in his annual report released Tuesday.

"The number of questionable examples that we noted across the system were certainly of concern this year ... we have a lot of examples in here of what we would call really questionable expenditures."

The report highlights include:

A litany of spending abuses at the Children's Aid societies, including all-inclusive trips to Caribbean resorts and questionable overtime. (One employee was paid $21,000 to catch up on paperwork);
$127 million charged to Hydro One credit cards without receipts. (One secretary charged $50,000 in goods that went to her boss, who signed the expenses);
$6.5 million charged on Ontario Power Generation credit cards without any receipts;
300,000 more OHIP cards than Ontarians;
Teachers and staff at four school boards charged thousands for questionable lunches, trips and gifts; and
Workplace Safety Insurance Board patients receiving quicker access to high-tech diagnostic exams than non-WSIB workers.
Spending abuses at several Children's Aid societies, which prompted an outcry last week after a draft report was leaked to the media, included purchases of SUVs worth $59,000 and expensive trips to all-inclusive Caribbean resorts.

One staff member, who was given a society-provided vehicle, also received a $600 a month tax-free car allowance.

I have not heard much about this since. If anyone has more information please share it here

Thursday, March 01, 2007

The COD Con

cod - to fool

When the news first broke that Ed Byrne had been asked to step down by Premier Danny Williams, it was came as quite the bombshell. He had the political image of being hard working, trustworthy and dedicated, where upon hearing the news, one might say, "Say it ain't so Ed!" If anyone were going to be honest in government it just might be Ed Byrne. But it appears that the former Minister of Natural Resources was one of 46 current MHA's who at some point unquestionably took money from the public purse. He was one of 5 current and former MHAs to overspend their constituency allowences. The others include Wally Anderson, Randy Collins, Jim Walsh and Percy Barrett. There are over 140 MHAs who may have been involved from the mid 1990's to 2004.

The public always seem to be suspicious of politicians in general because of other scandals nationally, provincially and historically since Canada became a nation. Newfoundland & Labrador is not the first or only province or political body to have political scandals. But now respect for elected officials is likely at an all time low, and only a couple of key figures come out untainted, Premier Williams, and particularly former Auditor General Elizabeth Marshall. It wouldn't be expected for multi-millionaire Premier Williams to accept the kinds of monies concerned with in this scandal, or any amount. But to me Beth Marshall seems to really have kept her hands on the moralistic tiller, and out of the till.

Since the 1990s the Internal Economy Commission acted like civil servers, dishing out cash nuggets in increasingly larger chunks for the next 15 years (see summary below). Sometimes it was even rationalized, for example, Bill 19 was tabled and passed. Bill 19 was significant in that it would give the IEC unregulated capacity to deliver the cash to MHAs. After Clyde Wells' time as Premier was done, the rules of the IEC began changing. It was easier to increase constituency allowance amounts, there was less transparency, less permission to increase various financial forms of income or support for MHAs, and tighter control over who could see the transactions that took place.

Whatever way you look at this scandal it is sad on a number of levels. First of all, the stress of the families of those MHAs must be very difficult. The job comes with pressures but also an image of prestige because of being a peoples' representative, a civil servant. But the image now is more inverted than ever, and families can suffer unenviable embassassment. It is also sad in that when you are connected to dishonesty it paints a new image for the public, something about the person that may not otherwise have been perceived. It can be interpreted to make the person seem morally or personally weak, and all too human. We have seen that picture many times before in our national and provincial histories, e.g., Sponsorship scandal, Hydro One, Mike Harris 1999 election.

Each new election carries the hope that people will have learned from the mistakes of others before them, and to not give in to the till temptation. The satisfaction of doing your best for the province's benefit with an already respectable pay should be enough. With the fall election, there may be plenty of new faces this time, who want to prove that. The extent of shady dealings within the House of Assembly would be enough, one would think, to make new candidates think twice about accepting cash bump ups. If this broad sweeping scandal will not teach people lessons, I'm not sure what it would take. Then again, year after year, we see that people have short memories.

Why weren't more questions asked by MHAs from the 1990s to 2004 about all these constituency allowance raises, discretionary spending amount increases, and lax rules which allowed them to be more unaccountable? It's apparant that an environment of acquiecense, and stealthy approval of the direction of where the IEC was going after the Clyde Wells era, saturated the mindset of MHAs. The whole affair leaves questions still unanswered, such as, "How much of say, constituency allowance increases, would be considered normal, given inflation, the passage of time, and demands on MHAs?"; "Why was there approval of $2850 in 2004 after the IEC began reversing previous benefit changes?"; "How much did Premiers Tobin and Grimes know about the IEC's actions, and what moral interventions should they have exercised to halt the abuse of public funds?"

It would be very interesting to hear some explanations from MHAs of their perceptions of the many increases, raises, benefits and rule changes that took place while they were in office. Did they not sense its secrecy was wrong? Again, it's sad when many MHAs do have many good qualities, are hard working, and appear to have sincere intentions for the people they represent.

It will also be very interesting to see how the fall election unfolds. Will many more MHAs throw in the towel? I'm thinking yes and we will see many new faces seeking party nominations. Let's hope that future potential representatives will learn valuable lessons from all of this and from now on, set a better example of honesty in government.

'Life is for one generation; a good name is forever'
~~ Japanese Proverb

---------------------------


Below are excerpts from Rob Antle's very detailed research.

------- For a Complete Reference see Rob Antle's article or the Feb. 23 issue of The Telegram -------

A Timeline of Key Developments in the MHA spending scandal
Taken from Rob Antles article "Behind Closed Doors" from the Feb. 23 issue of The Telegram

  • In 1989, new speaker of the House Tom Lush announced the creation of a commission to examine MHA salaries and benefits - initiative that dated back to the previous government. Lush noted that Newfoundland politicians were underpaid compared to their peers elsewhere in Canada in virtually every area - salary, indemnity and allowances.
  • Former MUN president M.O. Morgan was selected to head the panel.
  • MHAs at the time received a sessional indemnity of $28,811, plus a tax-free allowance of $14,405. They were entitled to a district allowance of between $1200 and $6000, depending on the geographical makeup of the area they represented.
  • The Morgan report raised MHA salaries to $35,000, and the tax-free allowance to $17,000 - an increase of more than 20 per cent.
  • The Morgan report wiped out the district allowance, and replaced it with a new constituency allowance system.
  • It set down the rules for members' travel - both to and from their districts, and within them.
  • Importantly, it advised the creation of an "accountable constituency allowance," with the IEC determining the amount.
  • The report's authors said that "Receipts should be required, and if no receipts are submitted for certain types of expenditure, some form of verification should be provided.
  • In 1990, the IEC - which is comprised of Tory and Liberal MHAs set the maximum amount for constituency claims at $7500. The committee also imposed rules on how that $7500 could be spent. ... Receipts were required.
  • The bulk could be used for things like office rentals, furniture, office supplies and secretarial assistance ($5000), and receipts were required.
  • A maximum of $1000 could be spent on non-partisan newspaper and radio advertising flags, pins and Christmas cards. Again, receipts were required.
  • The remaining $1500 was discretionary, but required receipts.
  • The $7500 limit on constituency spending remained in place throughout Clyde Wells era.
  • Over the next number of years some changes were made but for the most part, there appeared to be few changes that significantly bumped benefits during the Wells era.
  • MHAs even took pay cuts in the early 1990s, for example, when the Wells government brought in a severe austerity program.

    First Media Inquiry, 1991

    On July 14, 1991, the Sunday Express first raised questions about how MHAs were spending the constituency cash. Then-Speaker Tom Lush rejected the newpaper's request for detailed receipts.

  • Days later, then -NDP leader Jack Harris made public details of his own constituency spending. Said Harris, "I think the answer to it all is to encourage everybody to disclose (their receipts)."
  • Little public attention was paid to the constituency claims system until 1994, when CBC reporter Russell Wangersky reported on a controversy involving Liberal cabinet minister Tom Murphy.

    April 12, 1995 - another IEC review of the various Morgan commission report with a view to rationalizing the system.

    Clyde Wells era was concluding in 1996 and Brian Tobin's was about to begin and with that many more changes to the constituency claims process.

    1996

    The IEC said it would reduce travel and constituency allowances for members.

  • Pre-1996, there were capped limits on claims in certain categories.
  • Post-1996, those category caps weer removed.
  • Before, MHAs could spend a maximum of $7500 on things like newspapers, advertising, etc.
  • After 1996, that cap no longer existed.

  • The new rules also clarified that was ok for MHAs with a second home to claim accommodation expenses if that home was "within reasonable proximity of his or her district."
  • The IEC also permitted MHAs to claim $2000 per year from their constituency allowance without receipts, for "miscellaneous expenses."

  • In June 1996, the Tobin government passed an amendment to provincial law allowing the IEC to vary travel and constituency allowances "in accordance with rules made by the commission." In other words, the IEC could make the rules, and change the rules, as it saw fit.

    1998

    The IEC created a sub-committee to review constituency allowances for "members who appear to be having difficulties with their allotments." Its three members were Tory MHA Loyola Sullivan, Speaker Lloyd Snow and Liberal MHA Melvin Penney.

    On Dec. 1, 1998, immediately after question period - with the press gallery empty ... Government House Leader Beaton Tulk introduced amendments to the Internal Economy Commission Act. There was no debate. MHAs voted themselves a pay raise in 41 seconds, retroactive to the beginning of the fiscal year eight months earlier.

    Soon after Tobin was re-elected in 1999, the IEC again re-examined constituency benefits. Transparency and accountability of constituency spending faded.

  • There were new positions for MHAs with generous new salaries.
  • more hefty bumps in allowable spending
  • A sub-committee of the IEC recommended another increase of the "discretionary" portion of constituency allowances.
  • The IEC also axed the monthly limit on "discretionary" funding.
  • Furniture owned by the public, more easily became property of MHAs - Anything under $1000 would now be the property of the politician and not the public.

    After 2000

  • Bill 25 was passed which was significant in that is further blocked accountability and the auditor general from reviewing the House books.
  • In December 2000, constituency allowance amounts were raised yet again
  • The IEC even threatened Elizabeth Marshall salary and office operating allowance.

    In 2002 AG Elizabeth Marshall said that her office was blocked from carrying out an audit of the constituency allowances.
  • All this was done behind closed doors, with public disclosure delayed months or years from the dates those decisions were made.

    After Danny Willams was elected Premier in 2003, he "directed" the majority Tory members of the IEC to allow the AG back in to review the books. There seemed to be a sense of contrition as there were some reversals of allowance and benefits raises, that is, until 2004, when the now infamous $2850 constituency bonus was accepted by 46 out of 48 MHAs.

  • The overspending of constituency allowances by five current or former MHAs amounted to $1.6 million.
  • The House also made questionable payments of an additional $2.8 million to a number of companies for trinkets and baubles like keychains and fridge magnets. A key House employee was tied to one of the firms.
  • Monday, February 26, 2007

    Preventative Medicine & Health Savings

    “Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty.” ~ Plato

    If preventing health problems were promoted much more, then our health care system would save money, and people could be healthier. The investment of advertisements to show people how to prevent problems could save tens of millions in the long run for our province. Peoples' habits are alot to blame for many medical problems. Of course no matter how much some people take care of themselves, they will still get diseases and problems. People are also free to decide and choose how they want to live their lives. Because we have freedom and a free market economy, popular culture and society is also composed of contradictory forces which send mixed messages to us. For example, let's take fast food. Everywhere you go, on any media out there, and around the clock, we are bombarded with ads that associate feeling good with many foods that are ticking time bombs. Foods full of harmful ingredients like saturated and trans fats are offered then gobbled up by consumers. In every commercial, the tactic is to send the message that you will be feeling good, or the product will somehow bring you happiness. These food products may taste good for the time being, but they act like sludge on drain pipes and eventually need to be "snaked" or give the balloon treatment (angioplasty).

    I think we've only seen the tip of the iceberg in terms of what harmful things are in our typical every foods. Nitrates, and other preservatives, are they really linked to cancer? Possibly. What about the kind of feeds for cattle? What we don't know won't hurt business. In the meantime get preventative check ups like prostate digitals for men, breast exams for women, etc., and learn as much as you can about foods, what's really in them, and what are the effects of accumulating additives. I will guess that like the cover up of nicotine by Phillip Morris, and the whole food industry secret of the danger of trans fats, there are many other juicy bites of food hazard information that is not being disclosed because corporate money silences scientists.

    “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed" ~ Mahatma Ghandi

  • The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC)
  • Wednesday, February 21, 2007

    Great Big Storm

    Pretty - big mess



    The calm after the storm, downtown St. John's area

    Get weather forecast for Newfoundland & Labrador

    Tuesday, February 20, 2007

    The Stupid Gene and Fetal Fecal Syndrome

    The always interesting Sue's Blog brought this article to readers' attention yesterday, a commentary from the web site called This Canada. (You should read it to see a Kramer type racist rant) The writer definitely has a prejudice towards NL and frequently mentions the "get of your duff" stereotype, in his write up and also in comments made at Sue's Blog. So here is a response to his attitude.

    It has been overdue for a central Canada "journalist" to do the Newfoundland stereotyping so brave Erik Sorenson stepped up and painted "you people", Newfoundlanders, not sure about Labradorians, as all wailers and moaners. But I see this display as a cry for help. As a matter of fact, I think this ill individual has sabotaged the This Canada website and inadvertently gave readers a rare glimpse into the mental processes of someone afflicted by the "Stupid Gene Disease".

    Perhaps because it is socially embarrassing for families, relatives are often reticent on the disorder and sadly fail to seek help for the diseased. This Canada fell victim to the trickery of an afflicted individual in yesterday’s editorial. Whether the real writer was held at gunpoint, or may have fallen asleep just before print (oops), we may never really know. But for scientists and researchers who have sought proof that the "stupid gene" exists, yesterdays posting by victim Erik Sorenson, was a goldmine of evidence.

    One doctor from the University Health Network of Ontario was quoted as saying, "As rare as a picture of the giant squid, we have seen through print media, the manifestation of the ‘stupid gene’." Ten years ago The New England Journal of Medicine published the now infamous "Relationship Between Smog, Dirty Water & the Stupid Gene". In this controversial research study, it was proposed that some individuals who live near smog soaked and polluted water environments, may develop FFS, or Fetal Fecal Syndrome. Those predisposed to the disease have the stupid gene. Specifically, chromosome 21 is mutated.

    In normal individuals, the liver filters out toxic fecal fluid or matter. But for people with damaged chromosome 21, the liver is dysfunctional, and thus the victims become full of fecal toxins, which causes a neuritic plaque build up on the hippocampus cells of the brain. This in turn causes cognitive impairment (stupidity), learning disorders, and severe distortions of reality (Mengele et al., NEJM, 1995). To satisfy their constant need for the security of attention, the diseased such as Mr. Sorenson, exhibit childish and impudent outbursts or rants like that seen in Monday's This Canada commentary.

    It was probably just a coincidence that a couple of years ago, we were treated to another rare peek at the disease in action, when Margaret Wente wrote "her article" for the Globe. Of course, not all journalists from this region of the country have the stupid gene, this would be stereotyping, and that would be stupid. However, researchers who wrote the NEJM article say that several environmental factors are at play in the activation of the stupid gene. Likely factors are: breathing thick smog, drinking dirty lake water, and having high cholestoral. All factors block oxygen to the brain. The high cholestoral build up results from the typical Toronto diet of fries, burgers, and other entrail food products.

    There is good news. We can change what we can control, environmental factors; and there is also the promise of stem cell treatments, and transplants. First of all, isn’t it about time we cleaned up the water supply from Lake Ontario and Lake "Urine"? We CAN prevent fetal fecal syndrome and the full-blown "Stupid Gene Disease", by simply cutting the corporate dirty work, i.e., smog, stop drinking the water we pee out, and stop eating killed animal sinew. Ironically, taking Omega-3 rich seal oil capsules can lower cholesterol.

    No, Sorenson's parents were not brother and sister, nor man and sheep. It’s time society took the stupid gene disease seriously, brought it out of the closet, and demanded Medicare coverage for treatments. With an upcoming election, let’s use the sad case of Mr. Sorenson in a positive way, and get our elected officials to put money into treating the problem. Dr. James Watson, co-discoverer of the DNA double helix, is a strong advocate of harvesting stem cells from healthy umbilical cords, which can replace the stupid gene cells. As well, stem cell transplants are done at both Mount Sinai and Princess Margaret Hospitals. If you have a family member with the stupid gene disease, you may be a genetic match. However, doctors from the UHN of Ontario, advise that perfect matches are most likely when the donor is not living in the Great Lakes region. Otherwise there would be a high risk of stem cell transplant rejection, due to similar geno-codes.

    So while there is hope for the Erik Sorensons of the world, let’s be patient with the diseased, while we wait for a cure. Let’s clean up our attitude about the stupid gene disease, and for Cod’s sake let’s clean up the water, and air that stimulate the stupid gene in the first place. Let’s understand Sorenson, put money into research, and maybe someday he too can become a real fire fighter, garbage collector or even web editor. For now, Erik’s only career options are being a disease study subject, or a member of the Ontario Prejudice faction. But, good luck Erik, I pray you will go far!

    Sunday, February 11, 2007

    Junior Women's Curlers Sweep Tournament

    Congratulations to Stacie Devereaux, Stephanie Guzzwell, Sarah Paul and Julie Devereaux of Newfoundland & Labrador's Junior Women's Curling team. Just a few hours ago they came from a 6-4 deficit in the 10th end to win 7-6 over Manitoba's team. Three members are attending Memorial University, while one is currently in grade 12 in St. John's. They were inspired by Brad Gushue's win last year, and will no doubt inspire many others themselves. They have done the province proud. Well done girls!

    Friday, February 02, 2007

    Beautiful Places to Visit in Newfoundland & Labrador

    Updated: click here for more posts with NL scenes.
    (Note: to view the source of the photos, click the place names)
    There are so many places all around the province that are interesting to visit just because of their natural beauty alone. In this blog you will find some places that don't get alot of exposure, and that's too bad, for tourists, and for ourselves. To see a beautiful place that we didn't know existed is an education, and it also gives one a sense of pride by knowing it's part of our province. Growing up in a small community I hiked to every hilltop just to see the beauty of the community valley, the river which ran through out to the harbour, and the spectacular view of the offshore islands sitting in Placentia Bay. see Rushoon below
    The community of Rushoon, Burin Peninsula
    Francois (South coast of Newfoundland)
    We live in a hiker's paradise because there are so many accessible communities and towns that because of the reason for their existance in the first place, the fishery, are located next to harbours, inlets and bays, and hence had roads constructed to get there. Many places are hilly, and hiking to these hilltops is not only a good exercise but an excellent opportunity for some frameable photos.
    Labrador
    Korok-Palmer River Valley



    The Korok-Palmer River Valley is an excellent hiking and canoeing destination in Labrador.
    Check out this canoe.ca site for pictures of Labrador Odyssey 2001 which shows pictures of the Palmer River.

    Much of Labrador's coastline is dotted with many small islands, and with rugged shoreline. There are sandy beaches too, but Porcupine Strand may be the longest. More than 40 km long, this "Wonderstrand" is an oasis of resort type sandy beach. What a treasure to admire and preserve.
    Porcupine Strand
    Labrador, North Coast

    List of Coastal Labrador places and galleries
    Nain
    North West River

    List of Coastal Labrador places and galleries
    North West River beach festival
    South Coast of Newfoundland
    This park is located near Burgeo on the south coast. It has 7 km of sandy beach (Read more about this park at the Word Play) site.Sandbanks Provincial Park
    The drive out to the Port au Port Peninsula is scenic all the way, especially from Stephenville driving next to the ocean to the jewel of Cape St. George.
    Cape St. George
    Little Bay Islands (adjacent to the foot of the Northern Peninsula)
    This looks like the perfect harbour, protected by small islands at the entrance to act as breakwaters. Very picturesque.
    Seal Cove
    Bishop's Falls
    West Coast of Newfoundland
    Wreckhouse
    This is probably the windiest place in Newfoundland, but the scenery looks anything but wrecked.
    Trout River


    Located near the tip of the northern peninsula, Trout River begs to be visited, hiked, and photographed.
    Links

    Provincial parks

    Iceberg Finder

    Hospitality Newfoundland & Labrador

    Newfoundland & Labrador Tourism

    Provincial Ferry Service

    Scenic Touring Routes